Insightly already does CRM and projects. Why switch to Phloz?

Because Insightly does them generically and Phloz does them agency-shaped — plus the tracking infrastructure map Insightly has no place for. If a cross-industry CRM+PM is enough, Insightly is fine. If you want departments, retainers, per-client delivery, free client portals, and a typed tracking graph per client, that's the Phloz difference.

Is the migration easier since both pair CRM with projects?

Generally yes. Insightly's organisations → Phloz clients, contacts → client_contacts, projects → parent tasks with subtasks is a cleaner mapping than migrating from a pure sales CRM or a pure PM tool. The structural rethink is small because the CRM+PM shape already matches; you're mostly adding the agency defaults and the tracking layer.

Does Phloz have the tracking piece Insightly is missing?

Yes — that's the core wedge. Every GA4 property, GTM container, ad pixel, and conversion action per client lives in Phloz as a typed node with health state and a verification cadence. It's the thing every agency tracks in a Sheet because no CRM+PM tool, Insightly included, has a home for it.

Alternative to Insightly

The Insightly alternative for digital marketing agencies

Insightly is a generic CRM + projects combo; Phloz is the agency-shaped version, plus the tracking map it lacks.

What you're probably tired of

A generic CRM + project-management combo that fits no industry particularly well
Per-seat pricing on a tool you still bolt a tracking spreadsheet onto
CRM and projects in one place, but nothing shaped for agency client delivery (departments, retainers, portals)
No concept of tracking infrastructure — every pixel, property, and conversion lives outside Insightly

What changes on Phloz

The same CRM + project management, but agency-shaped — clients, departments, retainers, per-client delivery
Native typed tracking-infrastructure map per client (the thing Insightly has no home for)
Per-active-client pricing, with team seats included
Free client portals with magic-link access

Should you actually switch?

A switch is real cost — a few days of structural mapping, a parallel-running week, training time, and the friction of breaking habits your team has built. Worth it when the new tool meaningfully changes how you work; not worth it when the gain is incremental.

The five signals that you're ready to leave Insightly: (1) you're paying for seats or contacts you don't use, (2) you're running the tracking stack in a separate Sheet because the CRM has nowhere for it, (3) onboarding a new team member takes more than a day because the configuration is tribal knowledge, (4) clients ask "where do I see progress?" and you don't have a clean answer, (5) you're duplicating client data across two or three tools because no single tool fits.

If three of those five describe your agency, the structural upgrade is likely worth the switching cost. If only one or two, stay where you are and revisit at the next pricing renewal — switching for marginal gain is usually a worse decision than the marginal gain.

When Insightly is still the right choice

The honest counter-positioning. Insightly isn't wrong for everyone — these are the cases where staying makes more sense than switching. If any of them describe you, weigh the trade carefully before migrating.

You're not an agency — Insightly's cross-industry CRM+PM is a reasonable generalist choice for many small businesses.
You need Insightly's specific integrations or its marketing add-on and they're central to your workflow.
A sales-pipeline-driven CRM matters more to you than agency-shaped client delivery.
Insightly already fits how you work and the tracking gap isn't painful enough to switch for.

Migration: what to plan for

Insightly exports contacts, organisations, opportunities, and projects to CSV. Map organisations to clients, contacts to client_contacts, won opportunities to active clients, and projects to parent tasks with subtasks on the client; bring the clients and contacts in with Clients → Import, which reads a CSV and lets you match its columns, and re-create the rest by hand. The mapping is cleaner than most migrations because Insightly already pairs CRM with projects — the gain is the agency shape plus the tracking map. Plan about a day.

The structural rethink — mapping Insightly's shape to Phloz's opinionated agency model — matters more than the data move. Read the marketing agency CRM buyer's guide for the six capabilities that should drive the decision, and the pricing page to run the per-active-client math at your client count.

Insightly migration FAQ

The questions agency owners ask before signing the switch decision. Honest answers — same data we'd give a friend evaluating the move.

Insightly already does CRM and projects. Why switch to Phloz?: Because Insightly does them generically and Phloz does them agency-shaped — plus the tracking infrastructure map Insightly has no place for. If a cross-industry CRM+PM is enough, Insightly is fine. If you want departments, retainers, per-client delivery, free client portals, and a typed tracking graph per client, that's the Phloz difference.
Is the migration easier since both pair CRM with projects?: Generally yes. Insightly's organisations → Phloz clients, contacts → client_contacts, projects → parent tasks with subtasks is a cleaner mapping than migrating from a pure sales CRM or a pure PM tool. The structural rethink is small because the CRM+PM shape already matches; you're mostly adding the agency defaults and the tracking layer.
Does Phloz have the tracking piece Insightly is missing?: Yes — that's the core wedge. Every GA4 property, GTM container, ad pixel, and conversion action per client lives in Phloz as a typed node with health state and a verification cadence. It's the thing every agency tracks in a Sheet because no CRM+PM tool, Insightly included, has a home for it.

What you keep when you migrate

The honest list of what survives the move from Insightly. Your client list and contact records. Your active tasks and their assignees, statuses, due dates. Your custom fields only in part: Phloz has no custom fields, so map each one to a fixed client or task field, or into notes, as you go. Clients and contacts import from a CSV (Clients → Import); tasks are re-created by hand, so budget the time. Your inbound email addresses if you set up forwarding (re-pointed at the per-client Phloz inbound addresses).

What doesn't survive: historical activity logs (keep your old tool's export if you may need them). Bespoke automation rules built on Insightly's specific automation engine — these need to be re-expressed in Phloz's patterns (recurring tasks, assignment notifications, inbound thread routing) or kept as manual steps; Phloz has no Zapier connector, webhooks, or public API. Past time entries stay in your old tool's export — Phloz doesn't import them, but new time is logged in Phloz against each client (optionally a task) and rolls up against the retainer.

The trade is a lighter, more opinionated tool that runs your agency's shape natively — at the cost of some per-tool customisation that, in retrospect, was usually a workaround for a missing primitive. See agency project management software for the broader buyer's guide on what to evaluate alongside this switch decision.

Want the head-to-head, not the switch story?

The Phloz vs Insightly comparison covers what each tool does, what each doesn't, and when Insightly is the right choice — for the cases where you're evaluating rather than already unhappy.

Other tools agencies sometimes weigh as a Insightly alternative.

Try Phloz free

14 days free for new workspaces · No credit card · Starter tier free forever

Insightly and other product names referenced on this page are trademarks of their respective owners. Phloz is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Insightly. Comparisons reflect our understanding of publicly available information and may change over time — verify current features and pricing with each vendor before making a decision.