Phloz vs Productive

Frequently asked questions

Is Phloz really cheaper than Productive for an agency?

It depends on your team size and client count. Phloz charges per active client, not per seat or per contact, and viewer seats for client stakeholders are free — so the comparison turns on how many clients you run versus how many people and contacts you have. Run your own numbers on /pricing; we would rather you check than take our word for it.

Can Phloz replace Productive entirely, or is it a complement?

For digital marketing agencies running CRM + work management + tracking infrastructure on Productive (or trying to), Phloz is a full replacement. For agencies using Productive for non-agency-shaped work (sales pipelines for product companies, generic team PM unrelated to client work), Phloz isn't trying to replace those use cases.

How long does migrating from Productive take?

Most teams move in 1-3 days: a few hours of structural mapping, re-creating clients and open work in Phloz (the workspace-import flow takes a Phloz JSON export, not a CSV), and a parallel-running week to verify nothing slipped. The main lift is mental — accepting the agency-shaped defaults instead of recreating your Productive setup verbatim.

Does Phloz integrate with Productive?

Not natively in V1. Most agencies switching off Productive export their data and import to Phloz once, then leave Productive behind. If you need bidirectional sync — for instance, Productive stays as the company-wide CRM and Phloz handles agency ops only — V2 will add API-based integration. Talk to us about your specific case at contact@phloz.com.

Why doesn't Productive have a tracking infrastructure map?

Tracking infrastructure as a typed graph (every GA4 property, GTM container, ad pixel, conversion action, audience per client, with health state and verification cadence) isn't a feature Productive positions for. Phloz built it because every agency we talked to was tracking this in a Google Sheet. It's the moat — no other tool ships it.