Does Phloz do resource scheduling like Resource Guru?

No. Phloz has departments, task assignees, due dates, and a calendar view — but no availability model, booking grid, leave management, or clash detection. Resource Guru is genuinely good at that. Phloz answers a different question: not "who's free on Tuesday" but "is this client's work delivered, approved, on-retainer, and is their tracking intact".

Can I run Phloz and Resource Guru together?

Yes, cleanly — they barely overlap. Resource Guru schedules the people; Phloz holds the clients, the delivery, the time-vs-retainer rollup, and the tracking map. Agencies with a real capacity problem run both; if your scheduling fits in a team calendar, Phloz's assignees + due dates may be enough on their own.

Phloz has time tracking — is that the same as Resource Guru's?

Different direction. Resource Guru plans time forward (bookings against availability). Phloz logs time backward (hours actually spent, rolled up against the client's monthly retainer with over-servicing alerts). Planning vs burn — if you need both, they complement rather than compete.

Alternative to Resource Guru

The Resource Guru alternative for digital marketing agencies

Resource Guru schedules who's free. Phloz runs the clients, delivery, retainer-burn, and tracking — the agency layer around the calendar.

What you're probably tired of

Scheduling is solved but everything else isn't — client records, delivery, and tracking live in other tools (or nowhere)
The booking grid says who's busy, not whether the client's retainer is being over-serviced
No client-facing surface — clients can't see deliverables, approve work, or get reports
You're paying per person for a calendar and still need a CRM + PM + tracking stack around it

What changes on Phloz

One agency-shaped platform: CRM, tasks, messages, client portals, and the typed tracking-infrastructure map
Retainer-burn per client — hours logged vs the monthly budget, with over-servicing alerts in the weekly digest
Proactive tracking-health: audits, a 0–100 score, and a weekly email naming the clients whose recorded GA4/GTM/pixel setup needs attention
Per-active-client pricing, with team seats included

Should you actually switch?

A switch is real cost — a few days of structural mapping, a parallel-running week, training time, and the friction of breaking habits your team has built. Worth it when the new tool meaningfully changes how you work; not worth it when the gain is incremental.

The five signals that you're ready to leave Resource Guru: (1) you're paying for seats or contacts you don't use, (2) you're running the tracking stack in a separate Sheet because the CRM has nowhere for it, (3) onboarding a new team member takes more than a day because the configuration is tribal knowledge, (4) clients ask "where do I see progress?" and you don't have a clean answer, (5) you're duplicating client data across two or three tools because no single tool fits.

If three of those five describe your agency, the structural upgrade is likely worth the switching cost. If only one or two, stay where you are and revisit at the next pricing renewal — switching for marginal gain is usually a worse decision than the marginal gain.

When Resource Guru is still the right choice

The honest counter-positioning. Resource Guru isn't wrong for everyone — these are the cases where staying makes more sense than switching. If any of them describe you, weigh the trade carefully before migrating.

Capacity planning IS the problem — availability, leave, clash detection, booked-vs-free across weeks, utilization reports. That's Resource Guru's whole product and Phloz doesn't do it.
You schedule equipment and meeting rooms, not just people.
A dedicated ops/traffic manager runs the schedule daily and your PM/CRM stack is already settled.
You need utilization-based forecasting for hiring decisions.

Migration: what to plan for

Resource Guru holds people + bookings, not client data, so there's little to migrate — add your client list from wherever it actually lives (Clients → Import reads a CSV of it) and start logging time against clients in Phloz. What does NOT come across is the capacity layer: Phloz has no booking grid, availability, or leave management. If you need true capacity planning, keep Resource Guru alongside — the tools barely overlap.

The structural rethink — mapping Resource Guru's shape to Phloz's opinionated agency model — matters more than the data move. Read the marketing agency CRM buyer's guide for the six capabilities that should drive the decision, and the pricing page to run the per-active-client math at your client count.

Resource Guru migration FAQ

The questions agency owners ask before signing the switch decision. Honest answers — same data we'd give a friend evaluating the move.

Does Phloz do resource scheduling like Resource Guru?: No. Phloz has departments, task assignees, due dates, and a calendar view — but no availability model, booking grid, leave management, or clash detection. Resource Guru is genuinely good at that. Phloz answers a different question: not "who's free on Tuesday" but "is this client's work delivered, approved, on-retainer, and is their tracking intact".
Can I run Phloz and Resource Guru together?: Yes, cleanly — they barely overlap. Resource Guru schedules the people; Phloz holds the clients, the delivery, the time-vs-retainer rollup, and the tracking map. Agencies with a real capacity problem run both; if your scheduling fits in a team calendar, Phloz's assignees + due dates may be enough on their own.
Phloz has time tracking — is that the same as Resource Guru's?: Different direction. Resource Guru plans time forward (bookings against availability). Phloz logs time backward (hours actually spent, rolled up against the client's monthly retainer with over-servicing alerts). Planning vs burn — if you need both, they complement rather than compete.

What you keep when you migrate

The honest list of what survives the move from Resource Guru. Your client list and contact records. Your active tasks and their assignees, statuses, due dates. Your custom fields only in part: Phloz has no custom fields, so map each one to a fixed client or task field, or into notes, as you go. Clients and contacts import from a CSV (Clients → Import); tasks are re-created by hand, so budget the time. Your inbound email addresses if you set up forwarding (re-pointed at the per-client Phloz inbound addresses).

What doesn't survive: historical activity logs (keep your old tool's export if you may need them). Bespoke automation rules built on Resource Guru's specific automation engine — these need to be re-expressed in Phloz's patterns (recurring tasks, assignment notifications, inbound thread routing) or kept as manual steps; Phloz has no Zapier connector, webhooks, or public API. Past time entries stay in your old tool's export — Phloz doesn't import them, but new time is logged in Phloz against each client (optionally a task) and rolls up against the retainer.

The trade is a lighter, more opinionated tool that runs your agency's shape natively — at the cost of some per-tool customisation that, in retrospect, was usually a workaround for a missing primitive. See agency project management software for the broader buyer's guide on what to evaluate alongside this switch decision.

Want the head-to-head, not the switch story?

The Phloz vs Resource Guru comparison covers what each tool does, what each doesn't, and when Resource Guru is the right choice — for the cases where you're evaluating rather than already unhappy.

Other tools agencies sometimes weigh as a Resource Guru alternative.

Try Phloz free

14 days free for new workspaces · No credit card · Starter tier free forever

Resource Guru and other product names referenced on this page are trademarks of their respective owners. Phloz is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Resource Guru. Comparisons reflect our understanding of publicly available information and may change over time — verify current features and pricing with each vendor before making a decision.